Uncommon Biologies of the Uncommon World is in its very early stages of existence. The speculating, writing, illustrating, and printing I have done thus far are all tests for the final fictional encyclopedia. While the intention behind this piece is to push people to consider humanities decoupling from the natural world, in addition to speculating fantastical adaptations within the plant world due to this decoupling, it is also a study on representation of information. How does the believability of research change with the way in which it is presented to the viewer? Curating my facts and figures  with intentionality allows it to enter a space of questioning, is this fictional or factual?